Close

Articles Posted in Electronic Surveillance

Updated:

Privacy is in the News – Repeatedly

Two issues regarding the right to privacy, and its potential impact on criminal cases, appeared in the news recently.  These issues have no relationship to each other, but can both be highly relevant to criminal cases. The first involves a your man who was living alone in a South American…

Updated:

State v. Jackson/State v. Monroe – Telephone Calls From Jail Facilities

In my experience, client calls from jail or prison facilities come in two forms.  Sometimes, a client will call me directly from the facility using the facility’s telephone equipment.  On other occasions, I will receive a call from a friend or family member who will then “third-party” the client in…

Updated:

Carpenter v. United States, Third-Party Collection of Personal Information from Electronic Devices, and Fourth Amendment Rights and Protections

Our personal information is constantly being collected by third parties without our realization.  Every time we use one of our devices, we expose personal details and information to collection by any number of entities that use the data for various purposes.  Privacy is clearly on the decline as the use…

Updated:

State of NJ v. F.W. – New Sex Offender Supervision Decision Discusses, Among Other Things, the Minefield of Sex Offender Supervision Regulations

The latest decision from the NJ Appellate Division involving sex offenders, State v. F.W., consists largely of a rather complex discussion concerning the interrelationship of Community Supervision for Life (“CSL”), Parole Supervision for Life (“PSL”), The Sex Offender Monitoring Act (“SOMA”), and the Ex Post Facto clauses of the Federal…

Updated:

Grady v. North Carolina – Satellite-Based Monitoring of Sex Offenders Can Violate Fourth Amendment Rights

The United States Supreme Court decided Grady v. North Carolina on March 30, 2015.  After completing his prison term for sex offenses, the State determined that Grady was a recidivist sex offender, and wanted to place him on satellite-based monitoring.  Grady argued that the monitoring program, which required him to…

Updated:

New Jersey Supreme Court says State’s Wiretap Act is Constitutional

Edward Ates appealed his Bergen County conviction and life sentence for the murder of his son-in-law in Ramsey, New Jersey.  The Appellate Division affirmed, and the New Jersey Supreme Court granted certification to consider, among other issues, Ates’ assertion that New Jersey’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act was unconstitutional.…

Contact Us