In my experience, client calls from jail or prison facilities come in two forms. Sometimes, a client will call me directly from the facility using the facility’s telephone equipment. On other occasions, I will receive a call from a friend or family member who will then “third-party” the client in…
New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney Blog
Flowers v. Mississippi – Striking Prospective Jurors Because Of Race
Mississippi has tried Curtis Flowers six times for allegedly murdering four employees at a furniture store. Flowers is black and three of the four alleged victims were white. Mississippi has not been able to convict Flowers because the prosecutor(s) handling each trial are flaming racists who got caught doing something…
State v. Anthony and Out-Of-Court Identification Procedures
Previously, an alleged victim’s out-of-court identification of a defendant from a photo array was highly problematic. The primary issue was the extent to which the officer administering the array suggested to the victim which photo should be selected. This was frequently done by giving the victim positive feedback during the…
State v. A.M. – Statements to Law Enforcement by Defendants With Limited English Language Skills
Generally speaking, it is a mistake for individuals who are or may be charged with crimes to give statements to law enforcement officers. Many people believe they can talk their way out of being charged, but this is simply not true. Our courts have long acknowledged that the atmosphere in…
Do You Always Get the Attorney You Want?
Defendants frequently decide to change attorneys while their case is pending before the court. Substitutions of counsel happen very frequently in criminal cases. In fact, it is not uncommon for a criminal defendant to change attorneys repeatedly during the course of their case for any number of reasons. Sometimes, a…
State v. Nelson and Prolonged Traffic Stops
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. Nelson, which addresses the extent to which the police may prolong a traffic stop to investigate suspected criminal activity. The facts of the case are straight-forward. A New Jersey state trooper learned from a reliable source that a silver Infiniti with a known…
New York (Finally) Levels the Discovery Playing Field
Discovery in New York State criminal cases has long been completely unfair to defendants. The New York discovery rules have not been substantially revised since 1979. More than a dozen reform bills that have been introduced over the last 40 years have been successfully blocked by the State’s district attorneys’…
Timbs v. Indiana – Civil Forfeiture in Criminal Cases Can Violate 8th and 14th Amendments
Anyone with a narcotics-related case – regardless of how simple or complicated the facts may be – has been in this situation. Defense counsel is able to negotiate an acceptable plea deal with the prosecutor which requires their client to, among other things, forfeit property seized at the time of…
State v. Brown and the State’s Discovery Obligations
Our Supreme Court decided State v. Brown on February 4, 2019. The case is very significant because it addresses the ongoing issue of the State’s obligation to produce discovery in a timely manner. The facts surrounding the discovery violation and its ramifications in this case are somewhat complex. Suffice it…
State v. Hyppolite – State’s Discovery Obligations for Pretrial Detention Hearings
Criminal justice reform in New Jersey is now two years old. As we gain more experience with the underlying rules and procedures, it is worth reviewing whether they are achieving their stated goals and the effect they are having on our criminal justice system. State v. Hyppolite, recently decided by…